Its not the greatest deal of the century, but I was on Google Drive for 13 years. If they had a similar model, I would have excess storage now. Anyway, I chatted with their customer service. Once you purchase a server, you have the option to add as much storage as you want, for an extra fee. I did not ask pricing, only if it was possible. So, in reality, you can purchase the server, then upgrade the intial amount of storage you want for a one time price, then get your daily gb added. I only put this out there, as this is kind of a unique offer. If you dont like it, you dont have to hack the comment up to make it look terrible. For some people, these plans would work fine with, if your complaining about "only getting 2TB/year, well, your mind is stuck on "BUT I WANNA PAY $20/MO AND HAVE INFINITE STORAGE, WAHHHHH "
That reality doesnt exist anymore. This is simply another option for people. If it doesnt fit your needs, it does NOT mean it wouldn't work great for others.
Edit: I never said it was a great deal, simply said, look what I found.
I did not refer to you with my criticisms of their pricing structure. Myself I just do not like complicated pricing models which usually after closer inspection simply hide how expensive they are overall. (it applies to BIG players too - AWS Glacier storage is perfect example).
And yes always there is some very specific use case when they are real good win. But only in such special case which is rare.
How about colo hosting for your own server? Obviously the cheapest would be to just swap servers with a friend, but what is the cheapest colo offer for say a 3 unit rack mount server? Then you can just pay for your own storage and upgrade it as needed.
I've got about 9TB at Jottacloud, am in at least my third year there and have no real complaints. I'm sure with that amount of data I'm throttled, but I haven't found that to be a real issue. That may be because I just do everything with scripts running in the background. Am I missing something awful that they're doing?
If it works for you then use it:) Myself only problem with jottacloud I worry about there are reports of randomly corrupted files. Otherwise it is fair pricing and very upfront policies.
I know we're on the rclone forum but I'm thinking of signing up for jottacloud just because it's a good deal just for photos storage itself.
My question is, does it support rclone?
All my automated stuff is on various Linux boxes and I have multiple sets of files that get backed up both locally and to Jottacloud.
So I have a shell script called Generic_Jotta.sh that sets up timestamped log files, builds the rclone command to perform backup and emails the log to me. Then another script called Master_rclone.sh submits a series of calls to Generic_Jotta.sh, passing the source/backup directories and, optionally, whether or not that particular run should be a live backup or a dry run, e.g.:
If no parameter is supplied for $1 or the supplied parameter is anything other than "nodryrun", the job becomes a --dry-run. If the parameter is "nodryrun", then a live backup is performed.
I have a dry run scheduled several times during the day and check the emails it creates to see if I need to perform a live backup. I don't like to perform live backups automatically as it increases the risk of losing backed up data if something goes wrong with the source when I'm not paying attention.
Thanks for the detailed info. My main use case is to replace Google photos and rclone backup for my important documents etc so this probably doesn't apply to me.
I, by the way, find the BLOMP to look relatively cheap and as far as I can tell from the 20GB demo account it is also considerably fast.
I read the company behind this OpenStack Swift provider is Ai.Net. Is that a trustworthy company? I don't mind paying more, but I do mind to have to move all my data AGAIN. And loosing it would be an even bigger issue. But they seem legit and as they are contributing to rclone I assume based on their price model it is sustainable for the long time.
Their website / backend looks somewhat bad and lacks features which makes me somewhat sceptical.
They have a limo so I guess that's money well spent xD