I mean literally when adding Support Google Drive support in rclone why ncw had thought to implement, 1 REMOTE 1 TEAMDRIVE. Man it sucks. There are bunch of issues regarding it. What had made him think 1 TEAMDRIVE 1 REMOTE is best idea to support teamdrive? Literally, literally every Google Drive software and app / 3rd party google drive clients support Multiple Teamdrives either for google drive copy/sync move or mounting. Examples - MountainDuck, netdrive, webdrive, Airexplorer, FileZilla Pro,kodi add-on, stremio add-on, mixplorer, X-plore, ,expandrive, cloudmounter, raidrive , SolidExplorer, gd-share, airlivedrive, Google File Stream, nPlayer,sharelist
Only few ( I guess 3-4) softwares (but all are gui software, none is like rclone and linux user need a cli tool)mentioned here are fully supported in Linux, please think about them. There are people who have/added to hundreds of TeamDrive either for academics, business, media server movies contents/Plex.
I don't think its hard to add support for multiple teamdrives when those 17-20 softwares already natively support teamdrives. Either they treat TeamDrive as Folders
- Main Drive
-Shared With Me
Or a separate remote for all all teamdrives where all teamdrives I am added to are folders or Teamdrive like Root Drive and both root Drive and teamdrive inside Google Drive remote that is the structure is-- 1. My Drive 2. Teamdrive1 3. Teamdrive3...
TEAMDRIVES not as remote but all teamdrives as folders
Treat teamdrives like folder