just a quick question, is there a reason why SMB/CIFS mounts via rclone should be slower than regular fstab mounts? I was wanting to replace them with rclone mounts but downloading into a share went from 130MB/s to 20MB/s in comparison.
Run the command 'rclone version' and share the full output of the command.
rclone v1.60.1
os/version: ubuntu 22.04 (64 bit)
os/kernel: 5.15.0-1025-oracle (aarch64)
os/type: linux
os/arch: arm64
go/version: go1.19.3
go/linking: static
go/tags: none
Which cloud storage system are you using? (eg Google Drive)
Hetzner Storage Box
The command you were trying to run (eg rclone copy /tmp remote:tmp)
rclone mount -vv --no-modtime bx-oracle-arm-2:/u123456-sub0 /mnt/bx-oracle-arm-2
I was just wondering if there is a reason for this, not gonna lie, not exactly sure how SMB/CIFS really works. Any help would be appreciated, I'd much rather use Rclone mounts than having to put in my fstab mounts. I also tried using FTP/SFTP with similar results.
I used "wget http://speedtest.belwue.net/1G" to benchmark, both from the rclone and the fstab mount with drastic differences.
Hey and thanks for your reply. I already suspected as much. What I am actually trying to accomplish is some sort of portability with the mounts I am using and also trying avoiding the fstab mounts. For some reason I need to install additional packages each time and it’s becoming a pain.
Any advice what to use for the Hetzner Storage Box? I don’t think I’ll be able to use a cache mode seeing as how the boot volume is merely 50GB. Essentially I’d like to keep my 130MB/s downstream while also reading/playing video files. I saw some tests online and SFTP should be outperforming SMB/CIFS anyway, any idea why it’s not? Or was that test result implausible?
no i do not download from sb(storagebox)
tho, later on, i can test
--- from sb to local
--- from sb to my hetzner vm, both of which are in the same location