Other than Amazon, are there any companies that offer something comparable to Glacier, both in terms of functionality and pricing?
By "Glacier", I mean any of several things that they've had over the years and that I forget the differences between, like "Glacier", "Glacier Deep Archive", I think "S3 Glacier" being something different, etc.
By "functionality" I mean upload and in all likelihood never download.
By "pricing" I mean super-cheap per-byte storage and ingress, potentially absurd but hopefully never-used egress.
I've looked at some of the other big(-gish) names that I know of, like Wasabi and Backblaze, but haven't found anything comparable yet.
Typing "some of the big(-gish) names" made me realize I didn't check the just-plain-big-no-gish-about-it names. I now see that Microsoft Azure has an "archive tier" that they are putting forward as comparable to Glacier, and Google has "archive storage" that at least at first glance looks Glacier-ish. I have not looked closely at either of them, yet, but I figured I should mention them here. I'm interested in anyone's experience with them or opinion of them.
nothing is cheaper and more reliable to aws deep glacier.
what i do is keep recent backups in wasabi, as they do not charge for egress and in case of disaster recovery, have super fast download speed.
and keep older backups in aws deep glacier.
i rent a super cheap cloud vm from aws, in the same region as the bucket.
run rclone on that vm to move files from wasabi to aws.
Thanks. To be clear, though, I'm not looking for "cheaper and more reliable". I'm looking for "comparable", in a vague sense, to the specific kind of service that Glacier provides.