I already have all the Google Drive files on my computer locally. So with the crypt mounted on R:, it's a drag and drop job (and then I'd delete the non-enrypted files from Google Drive). Or maybe I miss something that you see?
Anyway, returning to your original suggestion. rclone copy from cloud to cloud.crypt won't duplicate files, yes?
oh ok. that would work. tho best to copy the files, check the dest files, then perhaps delete the source.
tho really need to use a folder, as i mentioned above and the docs
"t is recommended to point the crypt remote to a separate directory within the wrapped remote"
Sorry for not putting this clearer.
What's the point of putting all my files in R:/very-secret/ directory, which requires me going into R: and then clicking again on very-secret? There'd be no files outside of this directory.
I'd understand it if some files were supposed to be unencrypted and be freely readable by Google Drive. In such a case, the unecrypted files would sit outside very-secret, and every encrypted file would be "in a quarantine-of-sorts" inside a very mysterious looking directory R:/82357fj29892-f28ufn-whatever which is just a hashed version of very-secret.
no, that is not the case. very-secret will not appear in R:
the crypt can only see files that you copy into it.
and in any case, R: points to cloud:very-secret
the crypt remote needs to have a folder, as per your example, remote: cloud:very-secret
so why not try that, run the mount again, and copy a single file into R:
then try rclone ls cloud:very-secret: and will see the files in their crypted state.