dear ncw thx for rclone.
yet, i do strongly think using a 3rd party
encryption is more reasonable.
if i only use google drive and rclone,
yeah google only see rubbish, but rclone
see my plain text. yes rclone is open source i know and i do trust ncw.
but…how about try cppcryptfs (my choice after 3 month of testing), others include encfs,.cryptomator etc.(all open source)
in that case.
plain text --cppcryptfs–> encrypted txt and then
pass to rclone for upload to google drive.
google and rclone only see encrypted text.
cppcrypts can be used without network.
so if somone is serious, one should use the 3rd party, open source, cloud encryption method.
ps ncw again i love rclone, pls dont mind for that.
ps: pls google gocryptfs compare.
cppcryptfs is a c++ clone of it.
all open source. with the .exe signed on windows. with pgp signature.