I have just finished my first complete sync. After a couple of issues (all of which were resolved thanks to this forum) I notice one thing.
If I check to the size of my files using rclone size my local files and the encrypted bucket are identical in both number of files and size. When I log on to B2 cloud the webui shows the total file size as bigger.
I thought this might be due to version but I used rclone cleanup and it is still the same.
LOCAL FILES Total Objects 56415 147.978 GBytes
RCLONE SIZE B2BUCKET is Total Objects 56415 147.978 GBytes
B2 Clone web UI Total Objects 56145 159.3 GB
I cant understand the difference between the encrypted set and the unencrypted set? Its only a small amount but I am guessing XXX:XXX will be the same as ENCRYPT: ?
I have two folders in my backup and I have compared the individual folders by the following methods
RCLONE SIZE LOCAL matches the RECLONE SIZE ENCRYPTED BUCKET perfectly
Using windows explorer Local matches the mounted version of encrypted bucket perfectly
and like I said, total objects matches perfectly between local, rclone and b2 web gui.
I have no idea. Maybe wait a couple of days and see. When I run RCLONE check it matches also.
Is this forum a suitable place for Linux based questions aswell? It is to help me get rclone running on a cron if its not already running.
I’d expect the underlying remote for the crypt to be slightly larger than the crypt remote. So the encrypted data is slightly larger than the decrypted data.
I think I get it now. The underlying bucket is the ENCRYPTED data. That’s why it is 148.017 GB
When I look at the bucket through the ENCRYPT remote then this is unencrypted so that’s why it is 147.978 GB
I was getting confused with the the underlying bucket being unencrypted when it is in fact encrypted. So the B2 WEB GUI should always be higher than the local data, just not the big difference I am seeing at the minute. The WEB GUI should match the 148.017GB.
Thanks very much. I am an ex crashplan customer so I am somewhat relieved I can use this now. I am running it on a READYNAS Duo V2 so had to increase the swap file but all is good.